Chris Murphy may oppose bipartisan health bill unless it addresses ObamaCare ‘sabotage’

chris.murphy.3.jpg

[ad_1]

Sen. Chris MurphyChristopher (Chris) Scott MurphyOvernight Defense: Shanahan exit shocks Washington | Pentagon left rudderless | Lawmakers want answers on Mideast troop deployment | Senate could vote on Saudi arms deal this week | Pompeo says Trump doesn’t want war with Iran Senators demand Trump explain decision to deploy troops amid Iran tensions Senators demand Trump explain decision to deploy troops amid Iran tensions MORE (D-Conn.) said Wednesday he may vote against a bipartisan measure to lower health care costs next week unless it addresses a GOP “sabotage” of ObamaCare.

Murphy told reporters he is worried that there is “no language in the measure to counteract the massive sabotage campaign that’s happening by the administration.” The measure is currently before members of the Senate Health Committee.

The package in question was released earlier Wednesday by Sens. Lamar AlexanderAndrew (Lamar) Lamar AlexanderOvernight Health Care: Poll finds most Americans misunderstand scope of ‘Medicare for All’ | Planned Parenthood chief readies for 2020 | Drugmakers’ lawsuit ramps up fight with Trump Overnight Health Care: Poll finds most Americans misunderstand scope of ‘Medicare for All’ | Planned Parenthood chief readies for 2020 | Drugmakers’ lawsuit ramps up fight with Trump Trump’s health care focus puts GOP on edge MORE (R-Tenn.) and Patty MurrayPatricia (Patty) Lynn MurrayOvernight Health Care: Poll finds most Americans misunderstand scope of ‘Medicare for All’ | Planned Parenthood chief readies for 2020 | Drugmakers’ lawsuit ramps up fight with Trump Overnight Health Care: Poll finds most Americans misunderstand scope of ‘Medicare for All’ | Planned Parenthood chief readies for 2020 | Drugmakers’ lawsuit ramps up fight with Trump Trump’s health care focus puts GOP on edge MORE (D-Wash.), the panel’s leaders, and includes a range of measures aimed at lowering health care costs, such as protecting patients from massive “surprise” medical bills they get from out-of-network doctors.

But the measure steers clear of the divisive debate over ObamaCare, which Alexander says is by design after his previous effort with Murray to shore up the health care law ran aground because of the deep divide over ObamaCare.

Murphy, one of Democrats’ top advocates for the Affordable Care Act (ACA), says that the health care package should not move forward without addressing President TrumpDonald John TrumpGOP senator introduces bill to hold online platforms liable for political bias Rubio responds to journalist who called it ‘strange’ to see him at Trump rally Rubio responds to journalist who called it ‘strange’ to see him at Trump rally MORE’s actions, which include slashing funding for enrollment outreach, opening up skimpier, cheaper health plans and backing a lawsuit to overturn the entire ACA.

“I’m not planning to; I’m considering it,” Murphy told reporters when asked about voting no in the committee markup next week.

He said he might also offer amendments to try to address the administration’s actions, but those are sure to be rejected by Republicans on the committee.

Democrats are trying to strike a balance between attacking Republicans for their assaults on ObamaCare, an issue that has borne political fruit, and working in a bipartisan way on health care legislation.

Murphy’s opinion differs from that of Murray, the top Democrat on the committee, who negotiated the package with Alexander and is supporting it.

When asked about Murphy’s comments on Wednesday, Murray told reporters that she also wants to address the administration’s actions on ObamaCare but indicated she will not vote against the package over Republicans’ refusal to address ObamaCare in the legislation.

“I adamantly oppose what the administration has been doing,” Murray said. “We’re working on a much smaller package of bills, but I still agree with Chris and all of us that we need to address sabotage.”

Alexander said in a statement in response to Murphy’s comments that the issue of ObamaCare should be handled separately from the bipartisan package.

“What to do about ObamaCare is a different debate that I’m sure will continue,” Alexander said. “In the end, it is hard to lower the cost of health insurance without first lowering the cost of health care.”

Murphy said he has been talking to his Democratic colleagues about his concerns and said others share them, though no other Senate Democrat has threatened to oppose the package because of the ObamaCare concerns.

A spokesperson for Sen. Tammy BaldwinTammy Suzanne BaldwinOvernight Health Care: Poll finds most Americans misunderstand scope of ‘Medicare for All’ | Planned Parenthood chief readies for 2020 | Drugmakers’ lawsuit ramps up fight with Trump Overnight Health Care: Poll finds most Americans misunderstand scope of ‘Medicare for All’ | Planned Parenthood chief readies for 2020 | Drugmakers’ lawsuit ramps up fight with Trump Valedictorian says he was not allowed to use graduation speech to come out as gay MORE (D-Wis.), who has partnered with Murphy in the past on calling attention to ObamaCare “sabotage,” said that Baldwin is more concerned with adding a drug pricing transparency measure to the package than addressing ObamaCare in it.

“Senator Baldwin made it clear yesterday she would like her bipartisan FAIR Drug Pricing Act included in this legislation,” the Baldwin spokesperson said. “So she is not a yes on the larger HELP package at this time.”

[ad_2]

Source link